History of Henderson County, Kentucky


A BOOM.

About this time there was one of those periodical booms, which Henderson has so often experienced, and by which up to this time she has been so little benefitted[sic]. Land and town lots---(to use a common expression), went cleat out of sight, and wages out of all reason. The people seemingley went wild, and fully ten or fifteen houses were built during the year.

This was one of the years, for which the civil history of Kentucky is memorable, by the dreadful monetary derangement which lead to the passage of the relief laws, and gave rise to the most embittered and violent conflict of parties of the civilized world were in a painful state of disorder. The long wards of the French revolution had banished gold and silver from circulation as money, and had substituted an inflated paper currency, by which nominal prices were immensely enhanced. At the return of peace, a restoration of specie payments, and the return of Europe to industrial pursuits, caused a great fall in the nominal value of commodities, accompanied by bankruptcy upon an enormous scale. In Kentucky the violence of this crisis was enhance by the charter of fourty Independent banks, with an aggregate capital of nearly ten millions of dollars, which were by law permitted to redeem their notes, with the paper of the bank of Kentucky, instead of specie. These banks were chartered at the Session of 1817-18. Every little town and village in Kentucky wanted a bank, and Henderson was among the foremost. On January 26, 1818, an act to establish independent banks in this Commonwealth was approved.

FIRST BANK.

Among the number is the following : "A bank, to be denominated the Bank of Henderson, in the Town of Henderson, with a capital of one hundred and fifty thousand dollars, to be divided into one thousand five hundred shares of one hundred-dollars each, under the direction of Samuel A. Bowen, James Wilson, James Hillyer, Walter Alves, Nicholas C. Horseley, Leonard Lyne and Wyatt H. INgram, or a majority of them, for the sale of stock, and continue open for sixty days, unless the stock is sooner taken up."  The subscribers, their successoers and assigns were made a corporation and body politic in law, and in fact, by the anem and style of the President, Directors and Company, of the Bank of Henderson, and were authorized to continue until the last day of December, 1887.

This bank was given plenary, or full banking powers, and directed, as soon as one-fifth of the capital stock was actually received on account of the subscriptions, to give notice in two newspapers, printed in the State, to notify a time and place in the town, giving at least thirty day's notice for proceeding to the choice of a president and eight directors. The Board of Directors were invested with all power usually given officers of such corporations. The bank notes thrown into circulation, were restricted to three times the amount of capital, over and above the moneys then actually deposited in the bank, and in case of excess, the directors shall be individually liable for the same. Under this act, the Bank of Henderson organized, with what amount of paind up capital, it has been impossible to ascertain. Captain Samuel Anderson was elected the first president, and James Hillyer the first cashier. Monied transactions were pretty heavy in those days, as is evidence by old notes appearing her and there, in old time papers, now worthless.

The Bank of Henderson commence business in a two-story log house, which stood on the southeat corner of Main and Second Streets, and at the same time commenced the building of a brick banking house on Main Street. As a great many corporations have foolishly done before, the directors of this bank concluded to furnish all materials, and pay for all labor by the day, or by the job, as the case might be. Moses Morgan and John Mason were employed to do the woodwork, and Francis Hammill, the brick-work. The lumber was purchased from the "Henderson Steam MIll," operated by John Audubon & Co., and the brick manufactured by the company. As a consequence of this plan, the house cost a third more than it ought to have cost, and the building committee engaged in a continued dispute with the workmen. Francis Hammill's bill was disputed, and by agreement, submitted to John Lewis and Charles Peck, brick masons, who after calmly considering and investigating, gave Hammill more than be claimed. Another trouble, was the delay in getting work done. Most of the directors had a hand in the building, yet everyone of them charged liberally for all he or they did. This building, which is now known as the Kerr, Clark & Co. Counting Room, was begun in May, 1818, and completed the latter part of 1819. The following is the estimate made by Lewis and peck[sic], of the number of brick used :

Amount of brick in the Bank House, Henderson :

Basement story...............................................................  32,410
First story.......................................................................  63,570
Second story..................................................................  43.580
Parapet walls..................................................................  10,136
Vault..............................................................................  19,800
Shaft of chimney.............................................................    1,575
                                                                                      171,071
Deduction for chimney....................................................    3,000
                                                                                      158,071
                                                            " JOHN LEWIS,
                                                            " CHARLES PECK."

Francis Hammill's bill for brick work, which was allowed by the committee of arbitration, was three dollars per thousand for laying in the wall, twelve arches at three dollars each, and one arch at five dollars. this was the arch over the front door. The following is one of Audubon's bills :

"To the President and Directors of the Bank of Henderson, to Henderson Steam Mill.

To three pieces of scantling, 56 feet, at 41/2c......................................   $2 52
To two pieces of scantling, 34 feet......................................................     -----
To sixty rafters. 714 feet, at 4c...........................................................    28 56
To five pieces scantling, 40 feet, at 3c.................................................     1 20
To fifteen joints, 2781/2 feet, 6c.........................................................    16 71
                                                                                                            $48 99

                                                                            J. J. AUDUBON & CO."

The putty---thirty pounds used in glazing, cost forty cents per pound, only thirty-six cents per pound more than the same material is worth at this time. In the same summer of 1818, when the Bank of Henderson commenced business, the State was flooded with paper money, and to add to this financial uncertainty, our bank turned loose a goods boxfull{sic] of her notes. With this, speculation sprung up in all directions, large loans were rashly made, and as rashly expended. Most of these financial bubbles exploded within one year, and only a few were alive at the end of two years. Following in the wake of the unfortuniates, the Bank of Henderson, after two years of unsuccessful business, turned her toes to the daisies, and effected a settlement as best she could. In the meantime, the pressure of debt became terrible, and the power to replevy judgments was extended by the Legislature, from three to twelve months, by an act passed at the session of 1819-20.

The following bit of history, as much to be applied to Henderson as any other county, is reproduced simply to give the reader a faint idea of the frightful condition of monetary affairs throughout Kentucky, after the forty banks had been incorporated and let out their circulating issue. During the year 1819, this monetary distress became more and more alarming, and in the summer of 1820, the cry for further relief became overwhelming. Vast majorities of both houses of the Legislative were pledged to some measure which should relived the debtor from the consequences of his rashness. The reign of political quackery was in its glory. The sufferings of the patient were too acute to permit him to listen to the regular physician, who prescribed, time, industry and economy as the only honest and just remedy. He turned eagerly to the quacks, who promised him instantaneous relief, by infallible nostrums, and specifics without pain, without self denial, and without paying the penalty which nature always imposes upon any gross violation of her laws. The great cry of the people was, more money, and their heaviest complaint was, debt: Therefore the Legislature of 1820-21 chartered the bank called the "Bank of the Commonwealth," which was relived from all danger of suspension, by not being required even to redeem its specie. Its paper was made payable and receivable for public debts and taxes, and certain lands, owned by the State, south of Tennessee River, were pledged for the final redemption of its notes. Its business was to pour out paper in profusion, in order to make money plenty. The creditor was required to receive this bank paper in payment of all his debts, and if he refused to do so, the debtor was authorized to replevy the debt for the space of two years. By more mad legislation, the paper of the new bank sank rapidly to one-half its nominal value, and the creditor had his choice of two evils--one was to receive half of his debt in payment of the whole, and the other was to receive nothing at all for two years, and at the end of that time, do the best he could, running the risk of new delays at the end of that time, and the bankruptcy of his securities. The indignation of the creditor at this wholesale confiscation of his property, can be imagined, and as a consequence, society rapidly arranged itself into two parties, called Relief and anti-Relief. The constitutionality of the Commonwealth Bank act was tested and decided against the State. This decision created intense indignation among the debtor class, which was at that time in a large majority. An appeal was taken to the Court of Appeals, and the question came directly before them at the fall term, 1823. Their decision was awaited with intense anxiety by all parties. Terrible denunciations of popular vengeance in advance, if they dared to thwart the will of a vast majority of the people, were intended to warp their judgments or operate upon their fears. The Judges had maintained an unbroken silence, but when called upon, delivered their opinion seriatim and at length, calmly concurring with their brethren of the Circuit Court, that the act was in violation of the Constitution of the United States and totally void. The opinion created an immense sensation throughout every county of the State, and the conflict of parties was renewed with redoubled fury.

The majority now determine to sweep from their path, and make an example to future ages, of the three calm and recluse students, who had dared to set up reason against rage, and the majesty of truth and law against the popular will. The great majority had been accustomed to make and unmake, to set up and pull down at its soveriegn will and pleasure. The judiciary, by the Constitution, held their offices during good behavior and nothing less than two-thirds of both houses could remove them.

The canvass of 1824 was conducted with the hope of obtaining this result. General Joseph Desha, candidate of the relief party, was elected by the large majority, a vast majority of both houses were on the relief party. At the following meeting of the Legislative bar and assigned reasons at length for their decision. This was unsatisfactory to the crazed majority, and a vote was taken to remove the Judges of the Supreme Court, but a constitutional majority of two-thirds could not be obtained. They found they could not remove the Judges by impeachment or address, because their majority, although large, was not two-thirds of each house, but they could repeal the act, by which the Court of Appeals had been organized and could pass an act organizing a new court.

A bill to this effect was drawn up and passed by a large majority in the House of Representatives, and by a nearly equal majority in the Senate. No time was lost in organizing the new court, the old court, however, denied the constitutionality of the act, and still continued to sit as a Court of Appeals. A large majority of the bar of Kentucky recognized them as the true court, and a great majority of the Circuit Court Judges obeyed the mandates as implicitly as if no reorganizing act had passed. The title of parties now changed from relief and anti-relief to old court and new court.

Great activity was exerted in the canvass of 1825, and never were the passions of the people more silently excited. The result was the triumph of the old court party by a large majority in the popular branch of the Legislature, while the Senate still remained attached to the new court.

In the canvass of 1826 both parties arrayed in final struggle for the command of the Senate, and the old court party again triumphed. AT the ensuing session of the Legislature the obnoxious act was repealed, the opinion of Governor Desha to the contrary, and the three old Judges re-established de facto as well as de jure. Their salaries were voted them during their forcible and illegal removal from office, and all acts of the new court treated as a nullity. This certainly was one of the most signal triumphs of law and order, over the fleeting passions of people, which has ever been recorded in the annals of a free people.

The fate of the Commonwealth Bank, and its almost unlimited amount of worthless paper currency, and the replevin[sic] laws connected with it, was forever sealed by the triumph of the old court party. The replevin laws were repealed, and the bank extinguished by successive acts of the Legislature, which directed that its paper should be gradually burned, instead of reissued. In a few years, its paper disappeared from circulation. New banks were afterwards chartered and another vast quantity of paper money put afloat to stimulate the wildest spirit of speculation. Everybody rushed into the market to borrow money to carry out some pet thought or wild scheme, but this fabric was too baseless, and unreal to endure. IN the spring of 1837, all of the banks of Kentucky suspended specie payment. In this state of things the Legislature of 1837 met and legalized the suspension of the banks. By the exercise of superior business tact, the financial condition of things was again brought to a satisfactory conclusion, and the counties of the State again took on new life. During these troublous times Henderson County was fortunate to be represented by Leonard H. Lyne, Samuel G. Hopkins and Judge George Morris. Henderson County's history during this time, and since, is so closely interwoven with that of the State ithat it would be impossible to give a satisfactory view of the subjects which engrossed the attention of the people, without entering into details forbidden by the plan of an outline sketch like this. It is safe to say, however, that political relief and anti-relief, old and new court, excitement ran as high in Henderson as in any other county in the State, but from the character of men elected to represent the county during the time, we may safely conclude that Henderson stood by the honor of the States, and was enrolled with those, whose inherent attachment to sober and rational liberty guied them in every action, public or private.
 

History of Henderson County, Kentucky
by Edmund L. Starling
p. 146-155
published in 1887
public domain material




Return to the Henderson County KyGenWeb Page